Welcome to the BeatNic Blog. Here, you'll find the latest e cigarette news, commentary and maybe even a special or two.
With the re-organization of the E-Cig Express website, we decided to rename our old "E-Cig Express Blog" and move it from the Blogger platform to one right here on our website. Rather than move all of the old articles and comments over to a new platform, we decided to leave them in place. You can view the old blog here.
Please feel free to comment on any post you find here. We want to hear from you!
Posted by Scott McKirahan on December 12, 2014
It's been quite awhile since I wrote anything for the BeatNic Blog. I don't write just to write. If there is nothing significant worth talking about, what's the point in writing something (or in the case of some blogs, ANYTHING) just to get something published every week?
Honestly, there has been very little of any significance to talk about as far as ecigarettes go. Sure, the House recently sent a request to the FDA to change their grandfather clause date on e-cigs but that's just politics - a lot of meaningless talk that will have no impact at all on what the FDA does. The FDA is a corrupt, unelected group of appointees that doesn't give a rat's ass about what the boys on the Hill have to say. Only money talks with these people.
As I poured through the same old, same old ecig headlines today, I finally saw one that caught my eye - American Heart Association Study Finds Vaping More Effective for Quitting Smoking than FDA-Approved Products. Naturally, any study that sheds e-cigarettes in a good light gets my attention but this one was done by the American Heart Association - a group that is largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry and pretty much known as being anti-ecig.
According to the abstract of the study, e-cigarettes are more than twice as effective as current pharmaceutical solutions at smoking cessation. To be precise, electronic cigarettes were 18% effective at six months compared to only a 7% efficacy rate for FDA-approved nicotine replacement therapy products like nicotine gum, lozenges and the patch.
There's a problem; though, this is not a study in and of itself. Instead, it is a study of other studies. Six separate studies were used as the basis of the American Heart Association's findings. In reality, they cherry-picked six studies that have been done and used them as the basis of their report.
How in the world do you decide which six studies to use? According to ecigalternative.com, there were more than 50 e-cigarette studies done in 2014, alone! The Drexel report used more than 9,000 separate e-cigarette publications as the basis for its study.
Unfortunately, I have no way of knowing which six studies out of thousands that the American Heart Association selected as the basis for their findings. Abstracts of studies never give you those details but that will all be revealed in due time.
Surely, no matter which side of the e-cig debate you are on, you would have to agree that it would be incredibly easy to hand select six studies that fully supported whatever agenda you wanted to put forth. I could have picked six studies that showed that e-cigarettes were far more than 18% effective as cessation aids and also picked other studies that showed the pharmaceutical solutions to be less than 7% effective. Likewise, I could have found studies that showed that pharmaceutical solutions are more effective than e-cigarettes.
In light of how easy it would be to manipulate this type of "study" of studies, I must say that I am completely confused. Just four months ago, the American Heart Association wanted very strict regulations on e cigarettes. Is this yet another case of an organization trying to influence the FDA one way but putting out a completely opposite side to the public or is it a sudden change of heart (no pun intended)?
I can't help but wonder who really funded this study and what ties the researchers had to any companies that may benefit from its findings. Sadly, that's the way I'm wired these days. As much as I'd like to trumpet this study, I simply cannot give it the credibility that organizations like the American Vaping Society is giving it.
There is no doubt that the American Heart Association's latest ecigarette study will be challenged by every anti-vaping group out there and as much as I hate to admit it, they will have every reason to eye it with suspicion. If this study of carefully selected studies had showed the complete opposite, which it easily could have, what would your reaction have been?
BeatNic Blog Quote of the Day: "If you steal from one author it's plagiarism; if you steal from many it's research." - Wilson Mizner
Maybe the Daily Beast thought they could sneak one past the e-cigarette community by publishing the ecig-bashing piece, "E-Cigarettes: The Side Effects Nobody Talks About," on a Saturday. As is the case with 99% of media stories about e cigarettes, Amanda Woerner's piece is all about driving home an agenda full of half truths. Is [...]
Just a quickie this week. While trolling the web, I found an excellent article and infographic that points out common problems people have with clearomizers and how to fix those problems. The infographic, posted by Emily Lowe on the Ashtray Blog, covers it all pretty well, but I have a few things I would add to [...]
Late Friday, the CASAA published the comments they sent to the FDA regarding the proposed deeming regulations on electronic cigarettes and other tobacco products. Because the CASAA concentrates on alternatives to smoking and harm reduction, they did little to address the aspects of the proposed regulations that specifically address combustible tobacco products. They did, however, highlight [...]
Admittedly, many years of study are needed to become a doctor. It is a profession that lends itself to people who have a morbid curiosity about the human body and who are willing to put in a lot of hours in order to attain the mystical M.D. title. Society incorrectly assumes that the people who decide [...]
Currently, the state of Minnesota is the only state that has enacted a tax on e-cigarettes. Specifically, it taxes e-cigarettes, cartridges and e-liquid that contain nicotine at a whopping 95% of the wholesale price. According to a USA Today article, "at least 30 [other states] are considering e-cigarette taxes of some kind next year." Now, I'm [...]
Nothing controversial today. Just a quick note to let people know that we have now created a user's guide for the eLeaf Mini iKit. Although the eLeaf Mini iKit comes with a user's manual, unless you are very familiar with e-cigarettes that use tanks, the instruction are quite vague. We've had to coach a lot of [...]
Today, Reuters published an article about several new Electronic Cigarette studies that are being financially backed by the FDA - part of $270 million that they are spending on similar ecig research projects. Most of the studies in the Reuters article have an agenda that is clearly biased against the use of electronic cigarettes. The first [...]
It's a holiday weekend and I know that I sure don't feel like writing. Instead, I created these four Ecigarette memes. Feel free to share them!Celebrities can promote alcohol but not e-cigarettes?McDonalds ... I'm Loving It! (more than a bit too much)Yeah, it's e-cigarettes that are promoting enticing flavors to lure children!These celebrities make Ecigs [...]
According to a story on Reuters, the White House amended the proposed deeming regulations put forth by the FDA before they were released to the public for comment. The original draft included language that would have banned internet sales of e-cigarettes as well as language that questioned the safety of electronic cigarettes.Released for public review [...]